|
Today is :
New
policy guidelines for R&D budget proposals up
by Rita T. dela Cruz and the
Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Division |
April-June
2002
|
The national and regional R&D agencies convened
to discuss the policy guidelines for R&D budget proposals.
The activity was spearheaded and coordinated by the Bureau
of Agricultural Research (BAR), the agency mandated to orchestrate
all research activities in agriculture and fisheries of the
country.
The meeting was in accordance with the recent
National Budget Memorandum No. 95, issued by the Department
of Budget and Management (DBM) that all R&D agencies in
agriculture and fisheries are required to seek endorsement
from the Department of Agriculture (DA) for their budget proposals.
Likewise, it is in line with the pronouncement of President
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo that, "all R&D programs in
agriculture and fisheries must be vetted against the DA's
research agenda and program."
BAR Director Eliseo R. Ponce presented the policy
guidelines and procedures in the preparation, review and endorsement
of the agency budget proposal in agriculture and fisheries.
The R&D proposals for funding should be in accordance
to the 'one system, one program' approach. There should be
a common agenda and program in each sector for both national
and regional levels.
At the national level, programs are either commodity
or discipline-based. At the regional level, programs include
priority commodities and areas identified by the regions.
Agencies with national R&D responsibilities
include all staff bureaus, attached agencies and SCUs that
are members of the National R&D System for Agriculture
and Fisheries (NaRDSAF). Meanwhile, agencies with regional
responsibilities include Regional Field Units (RFUs), Bureau
of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) Regional Offices,
SCUs and regional agencies of the Department of Science and
Technology (DOST).
At the agency level, RDE projects/activities
are prioritized based on: 1) urgency of the problem, 2) magnitude
of expected impact/benefit, 3) immediate utility of output,
and 4) preparedness of the proponent to systematize planning,
implementation, monitoring and evaluation.
As for the funding allocation, Dr. Ponce made
it clear in his presentation that: all R&D budget proposals
should be within the indicative budget ceiling of the agency,
allocations should be based on the economic importance of
the commodity or sector, and that funding of R&D should
delineate, which covers the indirect research funds (IRF)
and the direct research costs (DRC). IRF includes regular
operations of the research center or institute based on its
mandate while DRC covers project-based expenses.
Every year, various R&D proposals are submitted
to the Bureau for funding. But because of the tight budget
and the amount of money alloted, not all of these proposals
are granted. The guidelines are therefore useful to the Bureau
in screening those that could respond to the needs of the
clientele, the industry, and the small farmers.
|